19384 views 0 comments

Sony X800E vs X900E Review (XBR49X800E vs XBR49X900E, XBR55X800E vs XBR55X900E)

by on July 31, 2017

Sony X800E vs X900E Review

Sony X800E and X900E are parts of Sony’s 2017 4K HDR TV lineup. In the market place, there are 3 screen sizes available for X800E including 43 Inch (XBR43X800E), 49 Inch (XBR49X800E), and 55 Inch (XBR55X800E), while for Sony X900E, there are 4 screen sizes option available including 49 Inch (XBR49X900E), 55 Inch (XBR55X900E), 65 Inch (XBR65X900), and 75 Inch (XBR75X900E). Since the screen sizes which available on both are only 49 inch and 55 Inch, this comparison certainly is as true to these sizes, (XBR49X800E vs XBR49X900E) and (XBR55X800E vs XBR55X900E). With the same screen sizes, X900E is sold hundreds dollar more expensive than X800E. So, what are the advantages of X900E as the higher series than X800E and which one is a better choice for you?

The Similarities and Differences between Sony X800E and X900E

There are a lot of major differences between Sony X900E and X800E which have big impact on their picture quality or performance of the features offered.  On their panel, Sony X900E uses VA panel with direct LED backlight and Full Array Local Dimming, while on the panel of X800E, it uses IPS panel technology with Edge-lit LED backlight and frame dimming technology. This difference has a big impact on their contrast ratio and side viewing angle coverage. Additionally, about peak brightness enhancement, there is X-Tended Dynamic Range Pro behind X900E while X800E is not equipped with this technology. The other major difference between them is about their picture engine where X900E is powered by the combination of 4K X-Reality Pro Engine and new 4K HDR Processor X1 Engine while Sony X800E is only powered by 4K X-Reality Pro Engine. This certainly has a big impact on the quality of the picture produced, particularly when they are displaying HDR Videos. Additionally, they also have a difference in the native refresh rate panel and motion clarity technology. For this case, X900E is powered by Motion Flow XR960 based on native 120 Hz refresh rate panel while X800E is powered by Motion Flow XR240 based on native 60Hz technology. The impact that caused is about their ability when playing fast paced contents and 24p movies, and also their ability to interpolate lower frame rate contents.

The excepting of what we have mentioned above, Sony X800E and X800E have similar features and powered by the same technology. For maximizing their rendition of colors, both of them are powered by TriLuminos Display. Additionally, for offering attractive and responsive smart TV experience, both of them also equally feature Google Android Nougat as their smart TV platform. Additionally, for connecting with other devices, they are also equipped with 4 HDMI ports and 3 USB ports as their major connectivity.

>> Please click here to see the price of X800E on Amazon.com <<

>> Please click here to see the price of X900E on Amazon.com <<

Sony X800E vs X900E Key Specs

Specs and Features XBR X800E XBR X900E
Size Available 43 Inch (XBR43X800E), 49 Inch (XBR49X800E), 55 Inch (XBR55X800E) 49” (XBR49X900E), 55” (XBR55X900E), 65” (XBR65X900E), 75” (XBR75X900E)
Panel Type IPS Panel VA Panel
Resolution 4K (2160 x 3840) 4K (2160 x 3840)
LED Backlight Edge LED Direct LED
Dimming Technology Frame Dimming Full Array Local Dimming
TriLuminos Display Yes Yes
Extended Dynamic Range Pro No Yes (5X)
HDR (High Dynamic Range) HDR 10, HLG (Ready) HDR 10, HLG (Ready)
Image Processor No 4K HDR Processor X1
Picture Engine 4K X Reality Pro 4K X Reality Pro
Dynamic Contrast Enhancer Yes Yes
Super Bit Mapping 4K HDR No Yes
Object-based HDR Remaster technology No Yes
Motion Control Motion Flow XR240 (native 60 Hz) Motion Flow XR960 (native 120 Hz)
3D Technology No No
Smart TV Platform Android TV Android TV
Speaker Type Bass Reflex Speaker Bass Reflex Speaker
Audio Output 10 W + 10 Watt 10 W + 10 Watt
HDMI Ports 4 (3 side/1 rear) 4 (3 Side, 2 Rear)
USB Ports 3 (side) 3 (side)
Price See the Price on Amazon See the Price on Amazon

Sony X900E vs X800E Performance

Picture Quality

The use different type of panel, backlight, and dimming technology makes they have significant difference in contrast. Sony X900E with VA panel, direct LED backlight, and Full Array Local Dimming has strong native contrast ratio and excellent black uniformity, even when local dimming is disabled. On the other hand, the contrast ratio and black uniformity of Sony X800E with IPS panel, Edge Lit Backlight, and frame dimming technology can be said poor. This certainly has a big impact on the picture quality produced by them, particularly when set in a dark room. Dark scenes look excellently on the screen of X900E. While on the screen of X800E, dark scenes look very disappointing with black looks tend to grey and color look in accurate. Additionally, with about 0.016 nits of black level, this is also quite dark to display shadow details of HDR images like what intended, while with about 0.1 nits of black level, this certainly is not dark to show shadow details of HDR images like what intended. As we know, for displaying shadow detail of HDR images like what intended, UHD alliance have set 0.05 nits or darker as the standardization that must be reached by an HDR TV. With poor performance in a dark room, this certainly makes Sony X800E is not a good choice when used in a dark room. Otherwise, X900E is a good TV for a dark room.

X-tended Dynamic Range Pro

When set in a moderately lit room with ambient light where low native contrast is not too noticeable, picture quality of Sony X800E looks far better. This is the most ideal light condition where the picture displayed on the screen of X800E looks well.  Nevertheless, what offered by X800E is not still better than what displayed on the screen of X900E, particularly when displaying HDR contents. Meanwhile, when set in bright room with a lot of ambient lights, the peak brightness of X800E might be bright enough to fight the glare, but it has a bit issue in dealing the reflection. On the other hand, X-tended Dynamic Range technology is very effective to boost the peak brightness of X900E so almost doubled than peak brightness reached by X800E. With far brighter peak brightness, Sony X900E has no problem when fighting the glare and can show highlight of HDR images far brighter. Additionally, it also has better reflection handling than X800E that makes picture displayed on the screen of X900E looks better than X800E when set in a bright room. But unfortunately, although peak brightness of X900E can be said great, but it is not still quite bright to show highlight of HDR images brighter than 1000 nits like what recommended by UHD Alliance.

Tri Luminos DIsplay

Additionally, talking about their color performance, both of the might be equally powered by TriLuminos Display and already support wide color gamut, but in reality, Sony X900E has a bit wider color gamut than X800E. Most of colors in DCI P3 color space of HDR images can be shown fairly saturated. But like most of other TVs, both of them also have a bit issue when showing saturated green. Additionally, Sony X800E also has a bit issue when showing saturated blue. Meanwhile, talking about their color volume, Sony X900E also has far better color volume than X800E. Although it has a bit issue when showing very dark deep color, but overall, X900E can show its wide color gamut at its brightness range. On the hand, Sony X800E can only show its wide color gamut for brighter color, while when showing very darker colors, its color gamut narrows significantly. Additionally, since its contrast ratio is poor and cannot show absolute black, this also makes dark colors doesn’t looks dark enough. Otherwise, about color gradient, Sony X800E precisely has a bit better color gradient than X900E. On the screen of X800E, color gradient looks nearly perfectly without any major color banding, while for X900E, it might still have a bit imperfection in dark blue and green, but this should not be a serious problem. Its color gradient even is still better than most of other TVS, even for high end TVs.


With 4K X-Reality Pro Engine behind them, both of Sony X800E and X900E do a great job when up-converting lower resolution to near 4K quality. No matter the resolution of the source, whether its Blu Ray movies with 1080p resolution, Movies from TV cable with 720p resolution, or even low resolution videos like DVDs movies with 480p resolution, the final image in 4K resulted is sharp and smooth with a lot of details are still preserved well.  And considering most of the contents which available in the market still have lower resolution than 4K, this feature certainly is still very important. Sony X900E even has ability more than that.  With Object-based HDR Remaster technology embedded on its X1 Engine, it is not only able to up-convert low resolution to 4K, but it also has ability to improve the color and brightness range of each object of images individually, so allowing you to enjoy any videos with the quality close to 4K HDR.

The only advantage of Sony X800E than X900E in term of picture performance is about its side viewing angle coverage. The use of IPS panel might make its contrast ratio is low and black uniformity is poor, but o the other hand, it offers wider side viewing angle coverage than VA panel. This means, the quality of the picture will look more consistent when viewed from an angle. On the other hand, side viewing angle coverage of Sony X900E is very limited. Started at 20 degrees off center and front, the quality of the picture will look degraded with black looks tend to grey and color shift. This means, if you have a plan to buy a TV to be used in a wide room with viewers watch TV from multiple angles. Sony X800E certainly is a better option for you.

The excepting of the side viewing angle coverage, overall, Sony X900E has better picture quality and greater HDR performance than X800E, no matter the light condition of a room where they are used. Almost all aspects of picture quality offered by X900E are better than X800E. So, if picture quality and HDR performance become your main consideration in buying TV, X900E certainly is a better option for you.

Motion handling and 24p Playback

Although the pixel response time of Sony X900E is a bit lower that means it is a bit better than X800E, but essentially, both of them equally do a great job when handling motion blur. If there is a difference in result, this difference is not too significant and might people might not notice about their difference. This allows you to enjoy fast paced videos like your favorite sport or fast movies clearly and smoothly on each of their screen with virtually no motion blur. Following fast moving object, there is only a very short trail where most of people might not notice about that. On the other hand, when playing 24p movies, Sony X900E offers better performance than X800E, particularly when playing 24p movies via 60p/60i signals like movies from streaming device or satellite TV. When playing 24p videos like Blu ray Movies, both of them might equally offer smooth and clear picture quality with judder-free. However, when playing 24p movies via 60p/60i signals, Sony X800E cannot completely remote the judder. Meanwhile, Sony X900E still offers judder-free. But since most of people might not sensitive to judder, this certainly is not a major problem for X800E.


Both of Sony X800E and X900E are equipped with the same inputs/outputs. As their major connectivity, they are equipped with 4 HDMI Ports and 3 USB Ports. Additionally, both of them are also equipped with 2 Composite In (AV In), 1 Component In, 1 Digital Audio Out (Optical), 1 Analog Audio Out (Mini Jack), 1 RF In (Terrestrial), 1 Ethernet In, And 1 IR In for IR Blaster. The difference is about where each of these inputs/outputs are located. Meanwhile, talking about their input lag, they have similar input lags under “Game Mode”. With about 30 ms – 35 ms of input lags, this might not as low as the input lags of the competitors like Samsung TV or LG TV. But even so, this is still low enough to play any casual games. But unfortunately, for playing fast paced games which require fast reflexes, this might be a bit disappointing.

Smart TV

Sony Android TV

Sony Android TV

As their smart TV platform, both of Sony X900E and X800E also features the smart TV platform that is Google Android 7.0 Nougat. Compared to last year version, there are not many major changes. In term of appearance, performance, and responsiveness, this might not less than the competitor. Its “Home Screen” is designed attractively, while its performance is also fast and responsive. A bit difference to last year version, there is a task switching menu where you now can open its by double clicking the home button on the remote,  allows you to switch between running apps quickly. Additionally, it also has new features called “Picture in Picture”. This allows videos from TV Tuner or HDMI input can be displayed on a hovering box at the top right corner of the screen. Additionally, Android TV now already supports ChromeCast where this allows you to cast any video from your smart phone or Table that also support ChromeCast to the TV. The advantage of Google Android TV is about its apps store named “Google Play Store” where it provides tons of interesting and useful apps, games, and contents which can be downloaded directly from you TV. Nevertheless, navigating on Google Android TV is still a bit confusing, even for you who are already familiar with Android OS on your Android Smart Phone.

Sony Remote 2017

As the controller, both of them also come with similar remote that is Sony Voice Remote. This remote is a bit larger and has a lot of buttons. One of the positive point of this remote, it is equipped built-in microphone for voice command or voice search. Paired to IR blaster, this remote also can be functioned as universal remote for controlling other devices connected on Sony TV Via HDMI Ports.

>> Please click here to check the latest price of X800E on Amazon<<

>> Please click here to check the latest price of X900E on Amazon <<


Performance Sony XBR-X800E Sony XBR-X900E
Color Gamut (3.8/5) (4.1/5)
Contrast (3/5) (4.5/5)
Peak Brightness (3.4/5) (4.9/5)
HDR (3.5/5) (4.1/5)
Viewing Angle (3.3/5) (2.5/5)
Motion Handling (4/5) (4.6/5)
Input Lag (4.1/5) (4.1/5)
UHD Up-scaling (4.4/5) (4.4/5)
Smart TV (3.9/5) (3.9/5)
Audio Performance (3/5) (3/5)


Overall, Sony X900E better picture quality and greater HDR performance than X800E, no matter the light condition of the room where they are used.  Its native contrast ratio is far stronger while black uniformity is also far better, makes dark scene looks more excellent than what produced by Sony X800E, particularly when set in a dark room. On the other hand, with brighter peak luminance and better reflection handling, Sony X900E is also offers better picture quality than X800E when set in a bright room with a lot of ambient lights. Additionally, although color gamut delivered by Sony X800E is not as wide as X900E, essentially, both of them already support wide color gamut, makes color of HDR images displayed on their screen looks fairly accurate. On other hand, as long as you don’t use it in a dark room or very bright room with a lot of ambient lights, picture quality of Sony X800E is also can be said good. Meanwhile, the major advantage of X800E than X900E is about the wider side viewing angle coverage that makes it is better when used in a wide room with viewers watch TV from multiple viewing angles. On the other hand, although Sony X900E offers a bit better performance than X800E on some features that offered, but their differences is not  too significant.

So, which is a better choice between them? As long as you don’t often use it in a dark room and you don’t mind to spend about hundreds dollar of your money, Sony X900E certainly is a better choice for you. However, if you have limited budget, with the advantage that offered, X800E is also not a bad choice. No, the decision comes back to you according to your preferences and budget.

>> Please click here to buy Sony X800E on Amazon <<

>> Please click here to read Sony X900E on Amazon<<

Be the first to comment!
Leave a reply »


Leave a Response